Memoize
- NAME
- SYNOPSIS
- DESCRIPTION
- DETAILS
- OPTIONS
- OTHER FACILITIES
- CAVEATS
- PERSISTENT CACHE SUPPORT
- EXPIRATION SUPPORT
- BUGS
- MAILING LIST
- AUTHOR
- COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
- THANK YOU
NAME
Memoize - Make functions faster by trading space for time
SYNOPSIS
- # This is the documentation for Memoize 1.03
- use Memoize;
- memoize('slow_function');
- slow_function(arguments); # Is faster than it was before
This is normally all you need to know. However, many options are available:
- memoize(function, options...);
Options include:
- NORMALIZER => function
- INSTALL => new_name
- SCALAR_CACHE => 'MEMORY'
- SCALAR_CACHE => ['HASH', \%cache_hash ]
- SCALAR_CACHE => 'FAULT'
- SCALAR_CACHE => 'MERGE'
- LIST_CACHE => 'MEMORY'
- LIST_CACHE => ['HASH', \%cache_hash ]
- LIST_CACHE => 'FAULT'
- LIST_CACHE => 'MERGE'
DESCRIPTION
`Memoizing' a function makes it faster by trading space for time. It
does this by caching the return values of the function in a table.
If you call the function again with the same arguments, memoize
jumps in and gives you the value out of the table, instead of letting
the function compute the value all over again.
Here is an extreme example. Consider the Fibonacci sequence, defined by the following function:
This function is very slow. Why? To compute fib(14), it first wants to compute fib(13) and fib(12), and add the results. But to compute fib(13), it first has to compute fib(12) and fib(11), and then it comes back and computes fib(12) all over again even though the answer is the same. And both of the times that it wants to compute fib(12), it has to compute fib(11) from scratch, and then it has to do it again each time it wants to compute fib(13). This function does so much recomputing of old results that it takes a really long time to run---fib(14) makes 1,200 extra recursive calls to itself, to compute and recompute things that it already computed.
This function is a good candidate for memoization. If you memoize the `fib' function above, it will compute fib(14) exactly once, the first time it needs to, and then save the result in a table. Then if you ask for fib(14) again, it gives you the result out of the table. While computing fib(14), instead of computing fib(12) twice, it does it once; the second time it needs the value it gets it from the table. It doesn't compute fib(11) four times; it computes it once, getting it from the table the next three times. Instead of making 1,200 recursive calls to `fib', it makes 15. This makes the function about 150 times faster.
You could do the memoization yourself, by rewriting the function, like this:
Or you could use this module, like this:
- use Memoize;
- memoize('fib');
- # Rest of the fib function just like the original version.
This makes it easy to turn memoizing on and off.
Here's an even simpler example: I wrote a simple ray tracer; the program would look in a certain direction, figure out what it was looking at, and then convert the `color' value (typically a string like `red') of that object to a red, green, and blue pixel value, like this:
- for ($direction = 0; $direction < 300; $direction++) {
- # Figure out which object is in direction $direction
- $color = $object->{color};
- ($r, $g, $b) = @{&ColorToRGB($color)};
- ...
- }
Since there are relatively few objects in a picture, there are only a
few colors, which get looked up over and over again. Memoizing
ColorToRGB
sped up the program by several percent.
DETAILS
This module exports exactly one function, memoize
. The rest of the
functions in this package are None of Your Business.
You should say
- memoize(function)
where function
is the name of the function you want to memoize, or
a reference to it. memoize
returns a reference to the new,
memoized version of the function, or undef
on a non-fatal error.
At present, there are no non-fatal errors, but there might be some in
the future.
If function
was the name of a function, then memoize
hides the
old version and installs the new memoized version under the old name,
so that &function(...)
actually invokes the memoized version.
OPTIONS
There are some optional options you can pass to memoize
to change
the way it behaves a little. To supply options, invoke memoize
like this:
- memoize(function, NORMALIZER => function,
- INSTALL => newname,
- SCALAR_CACHE => option,
- LIST_CACHE => option
- );
Each of these options is optional; you can include some, all, or none of them.
INSTALL
If you supply a function name with INSTALL
, memoize will install
the new, memoized version of the function under the name you give.
For example,
- memoize('fib', INSTALL => 'fastfib')
installs the memoized version of fib
as fastfib
; without the
INSTALL
option it would have replaced the old fib
with the
memoized version.
To prevent memoize
from installing the memoized version anywhere, use
INSTALL => undef
.
NORMALIZER
Suppose your function looks like this:
Now, the following calls to your function are all completely equivalent:
- f(OUCH);
- f(OUCH, B => 2);
- f(OUCH, C => 7);
- f(OUCH, B => 2, C => 7);
- f(OUCH, C => 7, B => 2);
- (etc.)
However, unless you tell Memoize
that these calls are equivalent,
it will not know that, and it will compute the values for these
invocations of your function separately, and store them separately.
To prevent this, supply a NORMALIZER
function that turns the
program arguments into a string in a way that equivalent arguments
turn into the same string. A NORMALIZER
function for f
above
might look like this:
Each of the argument lists above comes out of the normalize_f
function looking exactly the same, like this:
- OUCH,B,2,C,7
You would tell Memoize
to use this normalizer this way:
- memoize('f', NORMALIZER => 'normalize_f');
memoize
knows that if the normalized version of the arguments is
the same for two argument lists, then it can safely look up the value
that it computed for one argument list and return it as the result of
calling the function with the other argument list, even if the
argument lists look different.
The default normalizer just concatenates the arguments with character 28 in between. (In ASCII, this is called FS or control-\.) This always works correctly for functions with only one string argument, and also when the arguments never contain character 28. However, it can confuse certain argument lists:
- normalizer("a\034", "b")
- normalizer("a", "\034b")
- normalizer("a\034\034b")
for example.
Since hash keys are strings, the default normalizer will not
distinguish between undef
and the empty string. It also won't work
when the function's arguments are references. For example, consider a
function g
which gets two arguments: A number, and a reference to
an array of numbers:
- g(13, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]);
The default normalizer will turn this into something like
"13\034ARRAY(0x436c1f)"
. That would be all right, except that a
subsequent array of numbers might be stored at a different location
even though it contains the same data. If this happens, Memoize
will think that the arguments are different, even though they are
equivalent. In this case, a normalizer like this is appropriate:
- sub normalize { join ' ', $_[0], @{$_[1]} }
For the example above, this produces the key "13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7".
Another use for normalizers is when the function depends on data other than those in its arguments. Suppose you have a function which returns a value which depends on the current hour of the day:
- sub on_duty {
- my ($problem_type) = @_;
- my $hour = (localtime)[2];
- open my $fh, "$DIR/$problem_type" or die...;
- my $line;
- while ($hour-- > 0)
- $line = <$fh>;
- }
- return $line;
- }
At 10:23, this function generates the 10th line of a data file; at
3:45 PM it generates the 15th line instead. By default, Memoize
will only see the $problem_type argument. To fix this, include the
current hour in the normalizer:
The calling context of the function (scalar or list context) is
propagated to the normalizer. This means that if the memoized
function will treat its arguments differently in list context than it
would in scalar context, you can have the normalizer function select
its behavior based on the results of wantarray
. Even if called in
a list context, a normalizer should still return a single string.
SCALAR_CACHE
, LIST_CACHE
Normally, Memoize
caches your function's return values into an
ordinary Perl hash variable. However, you might like to have the
values cached on the disk, so that they persist from one run of your
program to the next, or you might like to associate some other
interesting semantics with the cached values.
There's a slight complication under the hood of Memoize
: There are
actually two caches, one for scalar values and one for list values.
When your function is called in scalar context, its return value is
cached in one hash, and when your function is called in list context,
its value is cached in the other hash. You can control the caching
behavior of both contexts independently with these options.
The argument to LIST_CACHE
or SCALAR_CACHE
must either be one of
the following four strings:
- MEMORY
- FAULT
- MERGE
- HASH
or else it must be a reference to an array whose first element is one of
these four strings, such as [HASH, arguments...]
.
MEMORY
MEMORY
means that return values from the function will be cached in an ordinary Perl hash variable. The hash variable will not persist after the program exits. This is the default.HASH
HASH
allows you to specify that a particular hash that you supply will be used as the cache. You can tie this hash beforehand to give it any behavior you want.A tied hash can have any semantics at all. It is typically tied to an on-disk database, so that cached values are stored in the database and retrieved from it again when needed, and the disk file typically persists after your program has exited. See
perltie
for more complete details abouttie
.A typical example is:
This has the effect of storing the cache in a
DB_File
database whose name is in$filename
. The cache will persist after the program has exited. Next time the program runs, it will find the cache already populated from the previous run of the program. Or you can forcibly populate the cache by constructing a batch program that runs in the background and populates the cache file. Then when you come to run your real program the memoized function will be fast because all its results have been precomputed.Another reason to use
HASH
is to provide your own hash variable. You can then inspect or modify the contents of the hash to gain finer control over the cache management.TIE
This option is no longer supported. It is still documented only to aid in the debugging of old programs that use it. Old programs should be converted to use the
HASH
option instead.- memoize ... ['TIE', PACKAGE, ARGS...]
is merely a shortcut for
FAULT
FAULT
means that you never expect to call the function in scalar (or list) context, and that ifMemoize
detects such a call, it should abort the program. The error message is one of- `foo' function called in forbidden list context at line ...
- `foo' function called in forbidden scalar context at line ...
MERGE
MERGE
normally means that the memoized function does not distinguish between list and sclar context, and that return values in both contexts should be stored together. BothLIST_CACHE => MERGE
andSCALAR_CACHE => MERGE
mean the same thing.Consider this function:
- sub complicated {
- # ... time-consuming calculation of $result
- return $result;
- }
The
complicated
function will return the same numeric$result
regardless of whether it is called in list or in scalar context.Normally, the following code will result in two calls to
complicated
, even ifcomplicated
is memoized:- $x = complicated(142);
- ($y) = complicated(142);
- $z = complicated(142);
The first call will cache the result, say 37, in the scalar cache; the second will cach the list
(37)
in the list cache. The third call doesn't call the realcomplicated
function; it gets the value 37 from the scalar cache.Obviously, the second call to
complicated
is a waste of time, and storing its return value is a waste of space. SpecifyingLIST_CACHE => MERGE
will makememoize
use the same cache for scalar and list context return values, so that the second call uses the scalar cache that was populated by the first call.complicated
ends up being called only once, and both subsequent calls return3
from the cache, regardless of the calling context.
List values in scalar context
Consider this function:
This function normally returns a list. Suppose you memoize it and merge the caches:
- memoize 'iota', SCALAR_CACHE => 'MERGE';
- @i7 = iota(7);
- $i7 = iota(7);
Here the first call caches the list (1,2,3,4,5,6,7). The second call
does not really make sense. Memoize
cannot guess what behavior
iota
should have in scalar context without actually calling it in
scalar context. Normally Memoize
would call iota
in scalar
context and cache the result, but the SCALAR_CACHE => 'MERGE'
option says not to do that, but to use the cache list-context value
instead. But it cannot return a list of seven elements in a scalar
context. In this case $i7
will receive the first element of the
cached list value, namely 7.
Merged disk caches
Another use for MERGE
is when you want both kinds of return values
stored in the same disk file; this saves you from having to deal with
two disk files instead of one. You can use a normalizer function to
keep the two sets of return values separate. For example:
This normalizer function will store scalar context return values in
the disk file under keys that begin with S:
, and list context
return values under keys that begin with L:
.
OTHER FACILITIES
unmemoize
There's an unmemoize
function that you can import if you want to.
Why would you want to? Here's an example: Suppose you have your cache
tied to a DBM file, and you want to make sure that the cache is
written out to disk if someone interrupts the program. If the program
exits normally, this will happen anyway, but if someone types
control-C or something then the program will terminate immediately
without synchronizing the database. So what you can do instead is
- $SIG{INT} = sub { unmemoize 'function' };
unmemoize
accepts a reference to, or the name of a previously
memoized function, and undoes whatever it did to provide the memoized
version in the first place, including making the name refer to the
unmemoized version if appropriate. It returns a reference to the
unmemoized version of the function.
If you ask it to unmemoize a function that was never memoized, it croaks.
flush_cache
flush_cache(function)
will flush out the caches, discarding all
the cached data. The argument may be a function name or a reference
to a function. For finer control over when data is discarded or
expired, see the documentation for Memoize::Expire
, included in
this package.
Note that if the cache is a tied hash, flush_cache
will attempt to
invoke the CLEAR
method on the hash. If there is no CLEAR
method, this will cause a run-time error.
An alternative approach to cache flushing is to use the HASH
option
(see above) to request that Memoize
use a particular hash variable
as its cache. Then you can examine or modify the hash at any time in
any way you desire. You may flush the cache by using %hash = ()
.
CAVEATS
Memoization is not a cure-all:
-
Do not memoize a function whose behavior depends on program state other than its own arguments, such as global variables, the time of day, or file input. These functions will not produce correct results when memoized. For a particularly easy example:
- sub f {
- time;
- }
This function takes no arguments, and as far as
Memoize
is concerned, it always returns the same result.Memoize
is wrong, of course, and the memoized version of this function will calltime
once to get the current time, and it will return that same time every time you call it after that. -
Do not memoize a function with side effects.
This function accepts two arguments, adds them, and prints their sum. Its return value is the numuber of characters it printed, but you probably didn't care about that. But
Memoize
doesn't understand that. If you memoize this function, you will get the result you expect the first time you ask it to print the sum of 2 and 3, but subsequent calls will return 1 (the return value ofprint
) without actually printing anything. -
Do not memoize a function that returns a data structure that is modified by its caller.
Consider these functions:
getusers
returns a list of users somehow, and thenmain
throws away the first user on the list and prints the rest:If you memoize
getusers
here, it will work right exactly once. The reference to the users list will be stored in the memo table.main
will discard the first element from the referenced list. The next time you invokemain
,Memoize
will not callgetusers
; it will just return the same reference to the same list it got last time. But this time the list has already had its head removed;main
will erroneously remove another element from it. The list will get shorter and shorter every time you callmain
.Similarly, this:
- $u1 = getusers();
- $u2 = getusers();
- pop @$u1;
will modify $u2 as well as $u1, because both variables are references to the same array. Had
getusers
not been memoized, $u1 and $u2 would have referred to different arrays. -
Do not memoize a very simple function.
Recently someone mentioned to me that the Memoize module made his program run slower instead of faster. It turned out that he was memoizing the following function:
I pointed out that
Memoize
uses a hash, and that looking up a number in the hash is necessarily going to take a lot longer than a single multiplication. There really is no way to speed up thesquare
function.Memoization is not magical.
PERSISTENT CACHE SUPPORT
You can tie the cache tables to any sort of tied hash that you want
to, as long as it supports TIEHASH
, FETCH
, STORE
, and
EXISTS
. For example,
works just fine. For some storage methods, you need a little glue.
SDBM_File
doesn't supply an EXISTS
method, so included in this
package is a glue module called Memoize::SDBM_File
which does
provide one. Use this instead of plain SDBM_File
to store your
cache table on disk in an SDBM_File
database:
NDBM_File
has the same problem and the same solution. (Use
Memoize::NDBM_File instead of plain NDBM_File.
)
Storable
isn't a tied hash class at all. You can use it to store a
hash to disk and retrieve it again, but you can't modify the hash while
it's on the disk. So if you want to store your cache table in a
Storable
database, use Memoize::Storable
, which puts a hashlike
front-end onto Storable
. The hash table is actually kept in
memory, and is loaded from your Storable
file at the time you
memoize the function, and stored back at the time you unmemoize the
function (or when your program exits):
Include the `nstore' option to have the Storable
database written
in `network order'. (See Storable for more details about this.)
The flush_cache()
function will raise a run-time error unless the
tied package provides a CLEAR
method.
EXPIRATION SUPPORT
See Memoize::Expire, which is a plug-in module that adds expiration functionality to Memoize. If you don't like the kinds of policies that Memoize::Expire implements, it is easy to write your own plug-in module to implement whatever policy you desire. Memoize comes with several examples. An expiration manager that implements a LRU policy is available on CPAN as Memoize::ExpireLRU.
BUGS
The test suite is much better, but always needs improvement.
There is some problem with the way goto &f
works under threaded
Perl, perhaps because of the lexical scoping of @_
. This is a bug
in Perl, and until it is resolved, memoized functions will see a
slightly different caller()
and will perform a little more slowly
on threaded perls than unthreaded perls.
Some versions of DB_File
won't let you store data under a key of
length 0. That means that if you have a function f
which you
memoized and the cache is in a DB_File
database, then the value of
f()
(f
called with no arguments) will not be memoized. If this
is a big problem, you can supply a normalizer function that prepends
"x"
to every key.
MAILING LIST
To join a very low-traffic mailing list for announcements about
Memoize
, send an empty note to mjd-perl-memoize-request@plover.com
.
AUTHOR
Mark-Jason Dominus (mjd-perl-memoize+@plover.com
), Plover Systems co.
See the Memoize.pm
Page at http://perl.plover.com/Memoize/
for news and upgrades. Near this page, at
http://perl.plover.com/MiniMemoize/ there is an article about
memoization and about the internals of Memoize that appeared in The
Perl Journal, issue #13. (This article is also included in the
Memoize distribution as `article.html'.)
The author's book Higher-Order Perl (2005, ISBN 1558607013, published by Morgan Kaufmann) discusses memoization (and many other topics) in tremendous detail. It is available on-line for free. For more information, visit http://hop.perl.plover.com/ .
To join a mailing list for announcements about Memoize
, send an
empty message to mjd-perl-memoize-request@plover.com
. This mailing
list is for announcements only and has extremely low traffic---fewer than
two messages per year.
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2012 by Mark Jason Dominus
This library is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
THANK YOU
Many thanks to Florian Ragwitz for administration and packaging
assistance, to John Tromp for bug reports, to Jonathan Roy for bug reports
and suggestions, to Michael Schwern for other bug reports and patches,
to Mike Cariaso for helping me to figure out the Right Thing to Do
About Expiration, to Joshua Gerth, Joshua Chamas, Jonathan Roy
(again), Mark D. Anderson, and Andrew Johnson for more suggestions
about expiration, to Brent Powers for the Memoize::ExpireLRU module,
to Ariel Scolnicov for delightful messages about the Fibonacci
function, to Dion Almaer for thought-provoking suggestions about the
default normalizer, to Walt Mankowski and Kurt Starsinic for much help
investigating problems under threaded Perl, to Alex Dudkevich for
reporting the bug in prototyped functions and for checking my patch,
to Tony Bass for many helpful suggestions, to Jonathan Roy (again) for
finding a use for unmemoize()
, to Philippe Verdret for enlightening
discussion of Hook::PrePostCall
, to Nat Torkington for advice I
ignored, to Chris Nandor for portability advice, to Randal Schwartz
for suggesting the 'flush_cache
function, and to Jenda Krynicky for
being a light in the world.
Special thanks to Jarkko Hietaniemi, the 5.8.0 pumpking, for including this module in the core and for his patient and helpful guidance during the integration process.