Perl 5 version 32.0 documentation

B::Showlex

NAME

B::Showlex - Show lexical variables used in functions or files

SYNOPSIS

  1. 	perl -MO=Showlex[,-OPTIONS][,SUBROUTINE] foo.pl

DESCRIPTION

When a comma-separated list of subroutine names is given as options, Showlex prints the lexical variables used in those subroutines. Otherwise, it prints the file-scope lexicals in the file.

EXAMPLES

Traditional form:

  1.  $ perl -MO=Showlex -e 'my ($i,$j,$k)=(1,"foo")'
  2.  Pad of lexical names for comppadlist has 4 entries
  3.  0: (0x8caea4) undef
  4.  1: (0x9db0fb0) $i
  5.  2: (0x9db0f38) $j
  6.  3: (0x9db0f50) $k
  7.  Pad of lexical values for comppadlist has 5 entries
  8.  0: SPECIAL #1 &PL_sv_undef
  9.  1: NULL (0x9da4234)
  10.  2: NULL (0x9db0f2c)
  11.  3: NULL (0x9db0f44)
  12.  4: NULL (0x9da4264)
  13.  -e syntax OK

New-style form:

  1.  $ perl -MO=Showlex,-newlex -e 'my ($i,$j,$k)=(1,"foo")'
  2.  main Pad has 4 entries
  3.  0: (0x8caea4) undef
  4.  1: (0xa0c4fb8) "$i" = NULL (0xa0b8234)
  5.  2: (0xa0c4f40) "$j" = NULL (0xa0c4f34)
  6.  3: (0xa0c4f58) "$k" = NULL (0xa0c4f4c)
  7.  -e syntax OK

New form, no specials, outside O framework:

  1.  $ perl -MB::Showlex -e \
  2.     'my ($i,$j,$k)=(1,"foo"); B::Showlex::compile(-newlex,-nosp)->()'
  3.  main Pad has 4 entries
  4.  1: (0x998ffb0) "$i" = IV (0x9983234) 1
  5.  2: (0x998ff68) "$j" = PV (0x998ff5c) "foo"
  6.  3: (0x998ff80) "$k" = NULL (0x998ff74)

Note that this example shows the values of the lexicals, whereas the other examples did not (as they're compile-time only).

OPTIONS

The -newlex option produces a more readable name => value format, and is shown in the second example above.

The -nosp option eliminates reporting of SPECIALs, such as 0: SPECIAL #1 &PL_sv_undef above. Reporting of SPECIALs can sometimes overwhelm your declared lexicals.

SEE ALSO

B::Showlex can also be used outside of the O framework, as in the third example. See B::Concise for a fuller explanation of reasons.

TODO

Some of the reported info, such as hex addresses, is not particularly valuable. Other information would be more useful for the typical programmer, such as line-numbers, pad-slot reuses, etc.. Given this, -newlex is not a particularly good flag-name.

AUTHOR

Malcolm Beattie, mbeattie@sable.ox.ac.uk