Test
- NAME
- SYNOPSIS
- DESCRIPTION
- QUICK START GUIDE
- TEST TYPES
- ONFAIL
- BUGS and CAVEATS
- ENVIRONMENT
- NOTE
- SEE ALSO
- AUTHOR
NAME
Test - provides a simple framework for writing test scripts
SYNOPSIS
- use strict;
- use Test;
- # use a BEGIN block so we print our plan before MyModule is loaded
- BEGIN { plan tests => 14, todo => [3,4] }
- # load your module...
- use MyModule;
- # Helpful notes. All note-lines must start with a "#".
- print "# I'm testing MyModule version $MyModule::VERSION\n";
- ok(0); # failure
- ok(1); # success
- ok(0); # ok, expected failure (see todo list, above)
- ok(1); # surprise success!
- ok(0,1); # failure: '0' ne '1'
- ok('broke','fixed'); # failure: 'broke' ne 'fixed'
- ok('fixed','fixed'); # success: 'fixed' eq 'fixed'
- ok('fixed',qr/x/); # success: 'fixed' =~ qr/x/
- ok(sub { 1+1 }, 2); # success: '2' eq '2'
- ok(sub { 1+1 }, 3); # failure: '2' ne '3'
- my @list = (0,0);
- ok @list, 3, "\@list=".join(',',@list); #extra notes
- ok 'segmentation fault', '/(?i)success/'; #regex match
- skip(
- $^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? "Skip if MSWin" : 0, # whether to skip
- $foo, $bar # arguments just like for ok(...)
- );
- skip(
- $^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? 0 : "Skip unless MSWin", # whether to skip
- $foo, $bar # arguments just like for ok(...)
- );
DESCRIPTION
This module simplifies the task of writing test files for Perl modules, such that their output is in the format that Test::Harness expects to see.
QUICK START GUIDE
To write a test for your new (and probably not even done) module, create a new file called t/test.t (in a new t directory). If you have multiple test files, to test the "foo", "bar", and "baz" feature sets, then feel free to call your files t/foo.t, t/bar.t, and t/baz.t
Functions
This module defines three public functions, plan(...)
, ok(...)
,
and skip(...)
. By default, all three are exported by
the use Test;
statement.
plan(...)
- BEGIN { plan %theplan; }
This should be the first thing you call in your test script. It declares your testing plan, how many there will be, if any of them should be allowed to fail, and so on.
Typical usage is just:
These are the things that you can put in the parameters to plan:
tests => number
The number of tests in your script. This means all ok() and skip() calls.
todo => [1,5,14]
A reference to a list of tests which are allowed to fail. See TODO TESTS.
onfail => sub { ... }
onfail => \&some_sub
A subroutine reference to be run at the end of the test script, if any of the tests fail. See ONFAIL.
You must call
plan(...)
once and only once. You should call it in aBEGIN {...}
block, like so:- BEGIN { plan tests => 23 }
ok(...)
- ok(1 + 1 == 2);
- ok($have, $expect);
- ok($have, $expect, $diagnostics);
This function is the reason for
Test
's existence. It's the basic function that handles printing "ok
" or "not ok
", along with the current test number. (That's whatTest::Harness
wants to see.)In its most basic usage,
ok(...)
simply takes a single scalar expression. If its value is true, the test passes; if false, the test fails. Examples:- # Examples of ok(scalar)
- ok( 1 + 1 == 2 ); # ok if 1 + 1 == 2
- ok( $foo =~ /bar/ ); # ok if $foo contains 'bar'
- ok( baz($x + $y) eq 'Armondo' ); # ok if baz($x + $y) returns
- # 'Armondo'
- ok( @a == @b ); # ok if @a and @b are the same
- # length
The expression is evaluated in scalar context. So the following will work:
A special case is if the expression is a subroutine reference (in either
sub {...}
syntax or\&foo
syntax). In that case, it is executed and its value (true or false) determines if the test passes or fails. For example,In its two-argument form,
ok(arg1, arg2)
compares the two scalar values to see if they match. They match if both are undefined, or if arg2 is a regex that matches arg1, or if they compare equal witheq
.- # Example of ok(scalar, scalar)
- ok( "this", "that" ); # not ok, 'this' ne 'that'
- ok( "", undef ); # not ok, "" is defined
The second argument is considered a regex if it is either a regex object or a string that looks like a regex. Regex objects are constructed with the qr// operator in recent versions of perl. A string is considered to look like a regex if its first and last characters are "/", or if the first character is "m" and its second and last characters are both the same non-alphanumeric non-whitespace character. These regexp
Regex examples:
- ok( 'JaffO', '/Jaff/' ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ /Jaff/
- ok( 'JaffO', 'm|Jaff|' ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ m|Jaff|
- ok( 'JaffO', qr/Jaff/ ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ qr/Jaff/;
- ok( 'JaffO', '/(?i)jaff/ ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ /jaff/i;
If either (or both!) is a subroutine reference, it is run and used as the value for comparing. For example:
The above test passes two values to
ok(arg1, arg2)
-- the first a coderef, and the second is the number 4. Beforeok
compares them, it calls the coderef, and uses its return value as the real value of this parameter. Assuming that$bytecount
returns 4,ok
ends up testing4 eq 4
. Since that's true, this test passes.Finally, you can append an optional third argument, in
ok(arg1,arg2, note)
, where note is a string value that will be printed if the test fails. This should be some useful information about the test, pertaining to why it failed, and/or a description of the test. For example:Unfortunately, a note cannot be used with the single argument style of
ok()
. That is, if you tryok(arg1, note)
, thenTest
will interpret this asok(arg1, arg2)
, and probably end up testingarg1 eq arg2
-- and that's not what you want!All of the above special cases can occasionally cause some problems. See BUGS and CAVEATS.
skip(skip_if_true, args...)
This is used for tests that under some conditions can be skipped. It's basically equivalent to:
...except that the
ok(1)
emits not just "ok testnum
" but actually "ok testnum # skip_if_true_value
".The arguments after the skip_if_true are what is fed to
ok(...)
if this test isn't skipped.Example usage:
- my $if_MSWin =
- $^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? 'Skip if under MSWin' : '';
- # A test to be skipped if under MSWin (i.e., run except under
- # MSWin)
- skip($if_MSWin, thing($foo), thing($bar) );
Or, going the other way:
- my $unless_MSWin =
- $^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? '' : 'Skip unless under MSWin';
- # A test to be skipped unless under MSWin (i.e., run only under
- # MSWin)
- skip($unless_MSWin, thing($foo), thing($bar) );
The tricky thing to remember is that the first parameter is true if you want to skip the test, not run it; and it also doubles as a note about why it's being skipped. So in the first codeblock above, read the code as "skip if MSWin -- (otherwise) test whether
thing($foo)
isthing($bar)
" or for the second case, "skip unless MSWin...".Also, when your skip_if_reason string is true, it really should (for backwards compatibility with older Test.pm versions) start with the string "Skip", as shown in the above examples.
Note that in the above cases,
thing($foo)
andthing($bar)
are evaluated -- but as long as theskip_if_true
is true, then weskip(...)
just tosses out their value (i.e., not bothering to treat them like values took(...)
. But if you need to not eval the arguments when skipping the test, use this format:or even this, which is basically equivalent:
That is, both are like this:
TEST TYPES
- NORMAL TESTS
These tests are expected to succeed. Usually, most or all of your tests are in this category. If a normal test doesn't succeed, then that means that something is wrong.
- SKIPPED TESTS
The
skip(...)
function is for tests that might or might not be possible to run, depending on the availability of platform-specific features. The first argument should evaluate to true (think "yes, please skip") if the required feature is not available. After the first argument,skip(...)
works exactly the same way asok(...)
does. - TODO TESTS
TODO tests are designed for maintaining an executable TODO list. These tests are expected to fail. If a TODO test does succeed, then the feature in question shouldn't be on the TODO list, now should it?
Packages should NOT be released with succeeding TODO tests. As soon as a TODO test starts working, it should be promoted to a normal test, and the newly working feature should be documented in the release notes or in the change log.
ONFAIL
Although test failures should be enough, extra diagnostics can be
triggered at the end of a test run. onfail
is passed an array ref
of hash refs that describe each test failure. Each hash will contain
at least the following fields: package
, repetition
, and
result
. (You shouldn't rely on any other fields being present.) If the test
had an expected value or a diagnostic (or "note") string, these will also be
included.
The optional onfail
hook might be used simply to print out the
version of your package and/or how to report problems. It might also
be used to generate extremely sophisticated diagnostics for a
particularly bizarre test failure. However it's not a panacea. Core
dumps or other unrecoverable errors prevent the onfail
hook from
running. (It is run inside an END
block.) Besides, onfail
is
probably over-kill in most cases. (Your test code should be simpler
than the code it is testing, yes?)
BUGS and CAVEATS
-
ok(...)
's special handing of strings which look like they might be regexes can also cause unexpected behavior. An innocent:- ok( $fileglob, '/path/to/some/*stuff/' );
will fail, since Test.pm considers the second argument to be a regex! The best bet is to use the one-argument form:
- ok( $fileglob eq '/path/to/some/*stuff/' );
-
ok(...)
's use of stringeq
can sometimes cause odd problems when comparing numbers, especially if you're casting a string to a number:- $foo = "1.0";
- ok( $foo, 1 ); # not ok, "1.0" ne 1
Your best bet is to use the single argument form:
- ok( $foo == 1 ); # ok "1.0" == 1
-
As you may have inferred from the above documentation and examples,
ok
's prototype is($;$$)
(and, incidentally,skip
's is($;$$$)
). This means, for example, that you can dook @foo, @bar
to compare the size of the two arrays. But don't be fooled into thinking thatok @foo, @bar
means a comparison of the contents of two arrays -- you're comparing just the number of elements of each. It's so easy to make that mistake in readingok @foo, @bar
that you might want to be very explicit about it, and instead writeok scalar(@foo), scalar(@bar)
. -
This almost definitely doesn't do what you expect:
- ok $thingy->can('some_method');
Why? Because
can
returns a coderef to mean "yes it can (and the method is this...)", and thenok
sees a coderef and thinks you're passing a function that you want it to call and consider the truth of the result of! I.e., just like:- ok $thingy->can('some_method')->();
What you probably want instead is this:
- ok $thingy->can('some_method') && 1;
If the
can
returns false, then that is passed took
. If it returns true, then the larger expression$thingy->can('some_method') && 1
returns 1, whichok
sees as a simple signal of success, as you would expect. -
The syntax for
skip
is about the only way it can be, but it's still quite confusing. Just start with the above examples and you'll be okay.Moreover, users may expect this:
- skip $unless_mswin, foo($bar), baz($quux);
to not evaluate
foo($bar)
andbaz($quux)
when the test is being skipped. But in reality, they are evaluated, butskip
just won't bother comparing them if$unless_mswin
is true.You could do this:
But that's not terribly pretty. You may find it simpler or clearer in the long run to just do things like this:
But be quite sure that
ok
is called exactly as many times in the first block asskip
is called in the second block.
ENVIRONMENT
If PERL_TEST_DIFF
environment variable is set, it will be used as a
command for comparing unexpected multiline results. If you have GNU
diff installed, you might want to set PERL_TEST_DIFF
to diff -u
.
If you don't have a suitable program, you might install the
Text::Diff
module and then set PERL_TEST_DIFF
to be perl
-MText::Diff -e 'print diff(@ARGV)'
. If PERL_TEST_DIFF
isn't set
but the Algorithm::Diff
module is available, then it will be used
to show the differences in multiline results.
NOTE
A past developer of this module once said that it was no longer being actively developed. However, rumors of its demise were greatly exaggerated. Feedback and suggestions are quite welcome.
Be aware that the main value of this module is its simplicity. Note that there are already more ambitious modules out there, such as Test::More and Test::Unit.
Some earlier versions of this module had docs with some confusing
typos in the description of skip(...)
.
SEE ALSO
Test::Simple, Test::More, Devel::Cover
Test::Builder for building your own testing library.
Test::Unit is an interesting XUnit-style testing library.
Test::Inline lets you embed tests in code.
AUTHOR
Copyright (c) 1998-2000 Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin.
Copyright (c) 2001-2002 Michael G. Schwern.
Copyright (c) 2002-2004 Sean M. Burke.
Current maintainer: Jesse Vincent. <jesse@bestpractical.com>
This package is free software and is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself.