pt::pegrammar - Introduction to Parsing Expression Grammars
Are you lost ? Do you have trouble understanding this document ? In that case please read the overview provided by the Introduction to Parser Tools. This document is the entrypoint to the whole system the current package is a part of.
Welcome to the introduction to Parsing Expression Grammars (short: PEG), the formalism used by the Parser Tools. It is assumed that the reader has a basic knowledge of parsing theory, i.e. Context-Free Grammars (short: CFG), languages, and associated terms like LL(k), LR(k), terminal and nonterminal symbols, etc. We do not intend to recapitulate such basic definitions or terms like useful, reachable, (left/right) recursive, nullable, first/last/follow sets, etc. Please see the References at the end instead if you are in need of places and books which provide such background information.
PEGs are formally very similar to CFGs, with terminal and nonterminal symbols, start symbol, and rules defining the structure of each nonterminal symbol. The main difference lies in the choice(sic!) of choice operators. Where CFGs use an unordered choice to represent alternatives PEGs use prioritized choice. Which is fancy way of saying that a parser has to try the first alternative first and can try the other alternatives if only if it fails for the first, and so on.
On the CFG side this gives rise to LL(k) and LR(k) for making the choice deterministic with a bounded lookahead of k terminal symbols, where LL is in essence topdown aka recursive descent parsing, and LR bottomup aka shift reduce parsing.
On the PEG side we can parse input with recursive descent and backtracking of failed choices, the latter of which amounts to unlimited lookahead. By additionally recording the success or failure of nonterminals at the specific locations they were tried at and reusing this information after backtracking we can avoid the exponential blowup of running time usually associated with backtracking and keep the parsing linear. The memory requirements are of course higher due to this cache, as we are trading space for time.
This is the basic concept behind packrat parsers.
A limitation pure PEGs share with LL(k) CFGs is that left-recursive grammars cannot be parsed, with the associated recursive descent parser entering an infinite recursion. This limitation is usually overcome by extending pure PEGs with explicit operators to specify repetition, zero or more, and one or more, or, formally spoken, for the kleene closure and positive kleene closure. This is what the Parser Tools are doing.
Another extension, specific to Parser Tools, is a set of operators which map more or less directly to various character classes built into Tcl, i.e. the classes reachable via string is.
The remainder of this document consists of the formal definition of PEGs for the mathematically inclined, and an appendix listing references to places with more information on PEGs specifically, and parsing in general.
For the mathematically inclined, a Parsing Expression Grammar is a 4-tuple (VN,VT,R,eS) where
VN is a set of nonterminal symbols,
VT is a set of terminal symbols,
eS is a parsing expression, the start expression.
Further constraints are
The intersection of VN and VT is empty.
For all A in VT exists exactly one pair (A,e) in R. In other words, R is a function from nonterminal symbols to parsing expressions.
Parsing expressions are inductively defined via
The empty string (epsilon) is a parsing expression.
A terminal symbol a is a parsing expression.
A nonterminal symbol A is a parsing expression.
e1e2 is a parsing expression for parsing expressions e1 and 2. This is called sequence.
e1/e2 is a parsing expression for parsing expressions e1 and 2. This is called ordered choice.
!e is a parsing expression for parsing expression e1. This is called a not lookahead predicate.
&e is a parsing expression for parsing expression e1. This is called an and lookahead predicate.
PEGs are used to define a grammatical structure for streams of symbols over VT. They are a modern phrasing of older formalisms invented by Alexander Birham. These formalisms were called TS (TMG recognition scheme), and gTS (generalized TS). Later they were renamed to TPDL (Top-Down Parsing Languages) and gTPDL (generalized TPDL).
They can be easily implemented by recursive descent parsers with backtracking. This makes them relatives of LL(k) Context-Free Grammars.
The Packrat Parsing and Parsing Expression Grammars Page, by Bryan Ford, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This is the main entry page to PEGs, and their realization through Packrat Parsers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar Wikipedia's entry about Parsing Expression Grammars.
Parsing Techniques - A Practical Guide , an online book offering a clear, accessible, and thorough discussion of many different parsing techniques with their interrelations and applicabilities, including error recovery techniques.
Compilers and Compiler Generators, an online book using CoCo/R, a generator for recursive descent parsers.
This document, and the package it describes, will undoubtedly contain bugs and other problems. Please report such in the category pt of the Tcllib SF Trackers. Please also report any ideas for enhancements you may have for either package and/or documentation.
EBNF, LL(k), PEG, TDPL, context-free languages, expression, grammar, matching, parser, parsing expression, parsing expression grammar, push down automaton, recursive descent, state, top-down parsing languages, transducer
Parsing and Grammars
Copyright © 2009 Andreas Kupries <firstname.lastname@example.org>